Re: Size of Path nodes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Size of Path nodes
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobJSaN8d3pkk_RMpuxScrB4NNPRh861SbvbbnSANEmS4g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Size of Path nodes  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> here.  For example, in the case of nodeSeqscan.c, almost two-thirds of
> the new lines of code are to add three additional methods that aren't
> called in parallel aware mode, and about half of the rest are due to a
> SeqScanState now having one integer field that's not part of
> ScanState, which require mechanical changes in a bunch of places ("ps"
> becomes "ss.ps").  The rest amounts to 15-20 lines of real code
> change.

Oops, bad proofreading.  It should say "are ONLY called in parallel
mode", not "aren't called in parallel aware mode".

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Size of Path nodes
Next
From: Chapman Flack
Date:
Subject: a word-choice question