Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobGpGJd7=6Tf_NLqaqQBDR=PvcmpF-GuCY5rS2kV=zzbw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sounds like both the approaches have some pros and cons, also there are
> some people who prefer mini-language and others who prefer JSON.  I think
> one thing that might help, is to check how other databases support this
> feature or somewhat similar to this feature (mainly with respect to User
> Interface), as that can help us in knowing what users are already familiar
> with.

+1!

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: More work on SortSupport for text - strcoll() and strxfrm() caching
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Some questions about the array.