Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobGMoubY9i67eLViyd2PW7v9ruERh3uEtjZQdB2GmL21A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> ISTM, that there's good enough reasons to go either way; I don't see
> what we're gaining by making these private. That just encourages
> copy-paste coding.

+1.  Frustrating Citus's attempt to open-source their stuff is not in
the project's interest.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Add generate_series(date,date) and generate_series(date,date,integer)
Next
From: Gilles Darold
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function