Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Improve heavyweight locks instead of building new lock managers? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Improve heavyweight locks instead of building new lock managers?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobFKOU44zAAjqpa1BSQ7kmdaGzDj4_kPEq_7ZbZ0fbeww@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improve heavyweight locks instead of building new lock managers?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:14 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Here's a *draft* patch series for removing all use of SHM_QUEUE, and
> subsequently removing SHM_QUEUE.

+1 for that idea.

But color me skeptical of what Thomas described as the "incidental
constification".

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve heavyweight locks instead of building new lock managers?
Next
From: James Coleman
Date:
Subject: Re: Multiple FPI_FOR_HINT for the same block during killing btreeindex items