Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobF1RNHS4dDDJXpVVwAO3MGaWjVsmP+Yqc7pt7VmaEcQg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators?  (Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators?  (Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 3:23 PM Mark Dilger
<mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Another option would be to have pg_dump take a strictness mode option.  I don't think the option should have anything
todo with postfix operators specifically, but be more general like --dump-incompatible-objects vs.
--omit-incompatible-objectsvs. --error-on-incompatible-objects vs. --do-your-best-to-fixup-incompatible-objects, with
oneof those being the default (and with all of them having better names).  If --error-on-incompatible-objects were the
default,that would behave as Robert recommended upthread. 
>
> I can totally see an objection to the added complexity of such options, so I'm really just putting this out on the
listfor comment. 

I'm not opposed to Tom's proposal. I just wanted to raise the issue
for discussion.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: track_planning causing performance regression
Next
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators?