Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobE3Syonbhr6snimeMtKN1bJ0OEFg8b1ci+Hig4SrTMFA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Responses Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
>> In my opinion this drastically increases readability and thus should be
>> applied. Will do so sometime tomorrow unless there's protest.
>
> -1 to introducing more inline functions before committable code replaces what
> you've already pushed for this thread.

This appears to be intended as an insult, but maybe I'm misreading it.

I am not thrilled with the rate at which this stuff is getting whacked
around.  Less-significant changes have been debated for far longer,
and I really doubt that the rate at which Andres is committing changes
in this area is healthy.  I don't doubt that he has good intentions,
though.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: SCRAM authentication
Next
From: Marko Tiikkaja
Date:
Subject: count_nulls(VARIADIC "any")