Re: [HACKERS] varlena beyond 1GB and matrix - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] varlena beyond 1GB and matrix
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobBTMXRnK-q=E+uqJ4vgz9g7zLDfDLurUuANzQ2QEhy5Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: varlena beyond 1GB and matrix  (Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] varlena beyond 1GB and matrix
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote:
>> Handling objects >1GB at all seems like the harder part of the
>> problem.
>>
> I could get your point almost. Does the last line above mention about
> amount of the data object >1GB? even if the "super-varlena" format
> allows 64bit length?

Sorry, I can't understand your question about what I wrote.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by trackingLSN progress
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] varlena beyond 1GB and matrix