Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobBJz1rV3_HOSEsQgf2ss+DUGKbwaqEpV3ccAEKETOzDg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 11:05 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> So, my question now is, would there be much opposition to backpatching
> beb4e9ba1652 + 1fb17b190341 to REL_14_STABLE?

It seems like it's been long enough now that if the new logic had
major problems we probably would have found them by now; so I feel
like it's probably pretty safe. Perhaps it's questionable how many
people we'll help by back-patching this into one additional release,
but if you feel it's worth it I wouldn't be inclined to argue.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Graceful way to handle too many locks
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix for pageinspect bug in PG 17