Re: hyrax vs. RelationBuildPartitionDesc - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: hyrax vs. RelationBuildPartitionDesc
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob=HVg+tvF5XyWW060K3XJsc-y1JdTOAVXk6zLGkHGQiQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: hyrax vs. RelationBuildPartitionDesc  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: hyrax vs. RelationBuildPartitionDesc
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 9:59 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes:
> > Should I add this patch to Older Bugs [1]?
>
> Yeah, it's an open issue IMO.  I think we've been focusing on getting
> as many feature patches done as we could during the CF, but now it's
> time to start mopping up problems like this one.

Do you have any further thoughts based on my last response?

Does anyone else wish to offer opinions?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Subject: Re: change password_encryption default to scram-sha-256?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Translation updates for zh_CN.po (Chinese Simplified)