On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I can see a usecase for having a pg_size_pretty(numeric) as an option.
>>> Not necessarily a very big one, but a >0 one.
>>
>> +1.
>
> +1, too.
I did some beautification of this patch. I think the attached version
is cleaner and easier to read. Thoughts?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company