Re: SegFault on 9.6.14 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: SegFault on 9.6.14
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob5Rp9hqSeiFHOaJSjgGr3XogNU6gnCrutGxt_ts1N4jg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SegFault on 9.6.14  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:48 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> To clarify my position --- I think it's definitely possible to improve
> the situation a great deal.  We "just" have to pass down more information
> about whether rescans are possible.  What I don't believe is that that
> leads to a bug fix that would be sane to back-patch as far as 9.6.

Sounds like a fair opinion.  I'm not sure how complicated the fix
would be so I don't know whether I agree with your opinion, but you
usually have a fairly good intuition for such things, so...

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_replication lag fields return non-NULL values even withNULL LSNs
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and KeyManagement Service (KMS)