Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization)
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob5Gu=_YENE_Ae9tA0_j-gfLUMs+312XDXpzSKEW37HZw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
> I think that the attached patch should at least fix that much. Maybe
> the problem on the other animal is also explained by the lack of this,
> since there could also be a MinGW-ish strxfrm_l(), I suppose.

Committed that, rather blindly, since it looks like a reasonable fix.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: decreasing memory needlessly consumed by array_agg
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Better way of dealing with pgstat wait timeout during buildfarm runs?