Re: SET syntax in INSERT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: SET syntax in INSERT
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob571i7mmHWx-3fG3tYqfdbgkxtrH_NZ-GLeSjDWijuAg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SET syntax in INSERT  (Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>)
Responses Re: SET syntax in INSERT  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to> wrote:
> SET syntax for INSERT was brought up a few years ago here:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2c5ef4e30908251010s46d9d566m1da21357891bab3d@mail.gmail.com
>
> From the discussion it seems that one committer was against, one committer
> was not against, and one committer saw something good in the proposal.
> Personally, I believe this would be a huge readability improvement to
> INSERTs with more than a few columns.  I'm willing to put in some work to
> make this happen for 9.7, but I'd like to know that I'm not wasting my time.

I'm mildly in favor of this proposal.  I think that "-1 PostgreSQL
isn't MySQL!" is maybe the lamest reason for not supporting useful
syntax that I can think of.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: SET syntax in INSERT