Re: Why so few built-in range types? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Why so few built-in range types?
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob4xcZ_Hp9tF9YoPLxfPR2CnfqBdGy2etCL0K40GUJOuA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why so few built-in range types?  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: Why so few built-in range types?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> I don't have any particular care about if cidr has indexing support or
> not.  I'm certainly not *against* it, except insofar as it encourages
> use of a data type that really could probably be better (by being more
> like ip4r..).

Not that you're biased or anything!  :-p

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation