Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob3hqmNr-EJsudHvFohXKn5wm=Un+nWKXuJiL0fibqhyQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue  (Shawn Debnath <sdn@amazon.com>)
Responses Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 2:36 PM Shawn Debnath <sdn@amazon.com> wrote:
> I disagree, at least with combining and retaining enums. Encoding all
> the possible request types with the current, planned and future SMGRs
> would cause a sheer explosion in the number of enum  values.

How big of an explosion would it be?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chapman Flack
Date:
Subject: Re: Infinity vs Error for division by zero
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and KeyManagement Service (KMS)