Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob1o8UUzoTHnS+zMfs37iOLCFzc4LdwgQJ65rEu-WZ6oQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 8:58 PM Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> The partition_bounds_copy() is not because of your changes, it's there in
> HEAD.

OK, but it seems to me that your version of my patch rearranges the
code more than necessary.

How about the attached?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: pg11.1 jit segv
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Convert MAX_SAOP_ARRAY_SIZE to new guc