On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I did some more experimentation on this. Attached is a patch that
>>> JUST does #1, and, ...
>
>> ...and that was the wrong patch. Thanks to Heikki for point that out.
>> Second try.
>
> But the results you gave in the previous message were correctly
> attributed?
The patch I attached the first time was just the last commit in the
git repository where I wrote the patch, rather than the changes that I
made on top of that commit. So, yes, the results from the previous
message are with the patch attached to the follow-up. I just typed
the wrong git command when attempting to extract that patch to attach
it to the email.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
