Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob-yfFqNubi2vPPG+iV1z-SAfUTCfbS7HrF=zQrCdU3DQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think we can consider the atomic commit and the atomic visibility
> separately, and the atomic visibility can build on the top of the
> atomic commit.

It is true that we can do that, but I'm not sure whether it's the best design.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: emergency outage requiring database restart