Re: getting rid of maintainer-check - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: getting rid of maintainer-check
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob-K_9BAB9_=n7gYxbpT69hAELWfk27Ych-DfXT5WX-5A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to getting rid of maintainer-check  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> The maintainer-check target never really caught on, I think.  Most
> people don't run it, and that in turn annoys those who do.  Also, it
> doesn't provide much functionality.
>
> I propose that we get rid of it and roll the functionality into the
> regular build.
>
> Specifically:
>
> - Running duplicate_oids during the regular build was already discussed
> elsewhere recently.  There are some details to be resolved there, but
> it's doable.
>
> - Checking for tabs in SGML files can be run during the regular
> documentation build without problems.
>
> - The NLS checks can also be run during the regular NLS-enabled build.
>
> That's it.  Any concerns?

I can't speak for anyone else, but personally I think that sounds like
a significant improvement.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.4 regression
Next
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: Re: [v9.4] row level security