Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob+ZRqk7-m2TK1gsQT=kDiJZAnGf+C6-YTz97NiTQqQMQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> I don't have anything in principle against your '--sections="foo bar"'
> suggestion, but it would be more work to program. Simpler, and probably more
> consistent with how we do other things, would be allowing multiple --section
> options, if we don't want to have named options such as I have provided.

I wouldn't object to that, but "more work to program" probably means
about an extra 10 lines of code in this particular case.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Tomas Vondra"
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore --no-post-data and --post-data-only