Re: Extending amcheck to check toast size and compression - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Extending amcheck to check toast size and compression
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob+LEp9tPJC3KteEdgk40WzSXyVnfuDZEfZkjEHZ4Ve7Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Extending amcheck to check toast size and compression  (Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Extending amcheck to check toast size and compression
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 6:56 PM Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Done that way.

I agree with what others have said: this looks fine.

But, is it plausible to add test coverage for the new checks, or is
that going to be too much of a pain?

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Missing include in be-secure-openssl.c?
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: should we enable log_checkpoints out of the box?