Re: [HACKERS] bigint vs txid user confusion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] bigint vs txid user confusion
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoaxk6=kQ0trQqeeGNt2gg0R5pD5aWH-fs0vT=HLjbppeg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] bigint vs txid user confusion  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] bigint vs txid user confusion  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 3:02 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I really wish we could just change the pg_stat_activity and
> pg_stat_replication xid fields to be epoch qualified in a 64-bit wide
> 'fullxid' type, or similar.

I think that approach is worth considering.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6