Re: Choosing parallel_degree - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Choosing parallel_degree
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoax8-wFg0OWWvL3-ge956rARzuMZzN1Vj-++DiqAwDySw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Choosing parallel_degree  (Julien Rouhaud <julien.rouhaud@dalibo.com>)
Responses Re: Choosing parallel_degree
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Julien Rouhaud
<julien.rouhaud@dalibo.com> wrote:
> Something like a "min_parallel_degree" then ?

Why not just parallel_degree without any prefix?  As in, when scanning
this table in parallel, the reloption suggests using N workers.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: plpgsql - DECLARE - cannot to use %TYPE or %ROWTYPE for composite types
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Pushdown target list below gather node (WAS Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification)