Re: 10.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: 10.0
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoavDqnVBJAHZCXM5-1KkR6876s94j8z92ip7O4mhdFOjQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 10.0  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: 10.0  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: 10.0  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Re: 10.0  (José Luis Tallón <jltallon@adv-solutions.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 4:00 PM, David G. Johnston
<david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
> 10.x is the desired output.

10.x is the output that some people desire.  A significant number of
people, including me, would prefer to stick with the current
three-part versioning scheme, possibly with some change to the
algorithm for bumping the first digit (e.g. every 5 years like
clockwork).

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Reviewing freeze map code
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 10.0