Re: recovery_min_apply_delay with a negative value - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: recovery_min_apply_delay with a negative value
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoatyRRAqwSU_X5E6+DhA9Zp1MFc2mUB7YS2BXKXsF1FuQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: recovery_min_apply_delay with a negative value  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: recovery_min_apply_delay with a negative value
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Of course, if recovery_min_apply_delay were a proper GUC, we'd just
> configure it with a minimum value of zero and be done :-(

Amen.  We should *really* convert all of the recovery.conf parameters
to be GUCs.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: NODE
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers