Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] pg_control_recovery() return value when not in recovery - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pg_control_recovery() return value when not in recovery
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoattZpPiuV=wumLPB4+XVDfveT8DT8U7Mamt0=t=sS3Dg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pg_control_recovery() return value when not in recovery  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] pg_control_recovery() return value when not in recovery
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote:
> Sorry for the slow response, but thinking back on this now, the idea of
> these functions, in my mind at least, was to provide as close to the
> same output as possible to what pg_controldata outputs.

I think that's a good goal.

> So if we make a change here, do we also change pg_controldata?

I think it would make more sense to leave both as they are and
consider writing more documentation.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] fresh regression - regproc result contains unwanted schema
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Extended statistics is not working on Vars hidden undera RelabelType