Re: [HACKERS] Update low-level backup documentation to match actual behavior - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Update low-level backup documentation to match actual behavior
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoasiihcYP60tsx-MB0O-KXCWZx6YPiD8qXDcWn04BPm3A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Update low-level backup documentation to match actual behavior  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Update low-level backup documentation to match actualbehavior  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 3:10 PM, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:
> On 8/24/17 7:36 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>
>> True as well. The patch looks good to me. If a committer does not show
>> up soon, it may be better to register that in the CF and wait. I am
>> not sure that adding an open item is suited, as docs have the same
>> problem on 9.6.
>
> Robert said he would commit this so I expect he'll do that if he doesn't
> have any objections to the changes.
>
> Robert, if you would prefer me to submit this to the CF I'm happy to do so.

Ha, this note arrived just as I was working on getting this committed.
I'll commit this to 11 and 10 presently; can you produce a version for
9.6?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Update low-level backup documentation to match actual behavior
Next
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Update low-level backup documentation to match actualbehavior