Re: New developer papercut - Makefile references INSTALL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: New developer papercut - Makefile references INSTALL
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoarR40AVGH6rqZSH=vsrOUsFm6=KqRYo4EPrUW82t19dg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New developer papercut - Makefile references INSTALL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 5:51 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> > But taking a step back, who is the actual audience for this? Do we
> > *need* a link pointing directly there, or is it enough to just point
> > to "use the docs on the web"? We can't link to the incorrect version,
> > but can we just link to /docs/ and leave it at that?
>
> Well, it's people compiling from source, so I guess we can assume some
> amount of cluefulness?  I think perhaps it'd be okay to say "go here
> and then navigate to the proper sub-page for your version".

It's kind of hard for me to imagine that not being enough for somebody.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christoph Heiss
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add reloption for views to enable RLS
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: cpluspluscheck complains about use of register