Re: dynamic shared memory: wherein I am punished for good intentions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: dynamic shared memory: wherein I am punished for good intentions
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoar+7Ck8OxkcHsFpWzJfNXLR2VFrEOaQSVqesFhKVAzrw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: dynamic shared memory: wherein I am punished for good intentions  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote:
>> (2) Default to using System V shared memory.  If people want POSIX
>> shared memory, let them change the default.
>
> Doesn't #2 negate all advantages of this effort?  Bringing sysv
> management back on the table seems like a giant step backwards -- or
> am I missing something?

Not unless there's no difference between "the default" and "the only option".

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: soroosh sardari
Date:
Subject: Pattern matching operators a index
Next
From: Daniel Farina
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation