Re: strange IS NULL behaviour - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: strange IS NULL behaviour
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaqKP-EosLHCyE3QBYRPf9nY4JBnayQNPD_WSoA=_X0cA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: strange IS NULL behaviour  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: strange IS NULL behaviour
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> The problem is that I don't believe this patch is commit-ready ---
> someone needs to research the IS NULL tests in all areas of our code to
> see if they match this patch, and I can't do that.  Is that something a
> reviewer is going to be willing to do?  I don't think I have ever seen a
> commit-fest item that still required serious research outside the patch
> area before committing.  I could ask just for feedback, but I have
> already received enough feedback to know I can't get the patch to a
> ready-enough state.

OK, well then there's probably not much point.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "MauMau"
Date:
Subject: Re: [bug fix] strerror() returns ??? in a UTF-8/C database with LC_MESSAGES=non-ASCII
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: New statistics for WAL buffer dirty writes