Re: [HACKERS] SCRAM salt length - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] SCRAM salt length
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoaoz=tc9mX4553uQZddzLTwUMNM9zCw9w7BQo2hUBhEtg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] SCRAM salt length  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] SCRAM salt length
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:42 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> In the initial discussions there was as well a mention about using 16 bytes.
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/507550BD.2030401@vmware.com
> As we are using SCRAM-SHA-256, let's bump it up and be consistent.
> That's now or never.

This was discussed and changed once before at
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/df8c6e27-4d8e-5281-96e5-131a4e638fc8@8kdata.com

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thom Brown
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Adding support for Default partition in partitioning
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SCRAM salt length