Re: CompactCheckpointerRequestQueue versus pad bytes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: CompactCheckpointerRequestQueue versus pad bytes
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaoVPO9LhJz5k4qFmgZ6TJfSxQroc_Vm_rMdGBHwBheiw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CompactCheckpointerRequestQueue versus pad bytes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: CompactCheckpointerRequestQueue versus pad bytes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> BTW, I wonder whether the code that checks for relfilenode conflict
> when selecting a pg_class or relfilenode OID tries both file naming
> conventions?  If not, should we make it do so?

I don't believe it does, nor do I see what we would gain by making it to do so.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: b-tree index search algorithms
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [v9.3] Row-Level Security