Re: WIP: Access method extendability - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: WIP: Access method extendability
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaoPrU2Ni1p=8wT9TYWdKnt6MZGSZX_rt2s9nzY98Y+1w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: Access method extendability  (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> wrote:
> Petr Jelinek wrote:
>>
>> On 2015-09-07 17:41, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
>>>
>>> Some notices:
>>>
>>> 1) create-am.3.patch.gz
>>>    As I understand, you didn't add schema name to access method. Why?
>>> Suppose, if we implement SQL-like interface for AM screation/dropping
>>> then we should provide a schema qualification for them
>>
>>
>> Why would access methods need to be schema qualified?
>
>
> Opfamily and opclass could be schema-qualified.

So what?

Making access methods schema-qualified seems like a completely
separate project, and an unnecessary one.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: gin_fuzzy_search_limit and postgresql.conf.sample
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [patch] Proposal for \rotate in psql