On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I'm a touch frustrated by that, as a large part of the point of submitting
> the output plugin separately and in advance of the downstream was to get
> attention for it separately, as its own entity. A lot of effort has been put
> into making this usable for more than just a data source for pglogical's
> replication tools. In retrospect naming it pglogical_output was probably
> unwise.
It's not too late to rename it.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
