Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Fix for documentation of timestamp type - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Fix for documentation of timestamp type
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoamt_zD=5vyagPWKu48-Q4pz-E77Mc3N+-6A29i-KtuHA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Fix for documentation of timestamp type  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Fix for documentation of timestamp type  (Cynthia Shang <cynthia.shang@crunchydata.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Fix for documentation of timestamp type  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> I find this a bit unclear, because the revised text kind of jumps back
>> and forth between the floating-point and integer formats.  Perhaps
>> something like this:
>
> Your wording seems OK to me, although I'd drop the "instead".

Good idea.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take
Next
From: Ian Jackson
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [OSSTEST PATCH 0/1] PostgreSQL db: Retry on constraintviolation [and 2 more messages]