On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au> wrote:
> On 08/07/2012 02:27 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> I did not commit the advanced.sgml changes.
>
> That's arguably the most important point to raise this. The most recent
> question came from someone who actually bothered to RTFM and believed based
> on the advanced-transactions page that rollback rolls *everything* back.
>
> Some kind of hint that there are execptions is IMO very important. I'm not
> sure what the best form for it to take is.
I'm not sure, either. Maybe we should avoid blanket statements and
just say something like:
Note: Some operations on sequences are non-transactional and will not
be rolled back on transaction abort. See <xref>.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
