Re: Parallel Seq Scan - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoam3400G2zjjvWKJOLSz=bqsfuCk3tGwxAVFvfnkDkKBA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel Seq Scan  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Parallel Seq Scan  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think initPlan will work with the existing patches as we are always
> executing it in master and then sending the result to workers. Refer
> below code in funnel patch:

Sure, *if* that's what we're doing, then it will work.  But if an
initPlan actually attaches below a funnel, then it will break.  Maybe
that can't happen; I'm just sayin' ...

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_ctl/pg_rewind tests vs. slow AIX buildfarm members
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel Seq Scan