Re: background workers, round three - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: background workers, round three
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoajaOCj8a6y7WEPQOE8=Ex1wJ=kZGXcwfKjOtOzeMc1LQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: background workers, round three  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: background workers, round three  (Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> Finally I got the chance to put my hands on this code. Really sorry
> for the late replay.

Thanks for the review.  I'll respond to this in more detail later, but
to make a long story short, I'm looking to apply
terminate-worker-v1.patch (possibly with modifications after going
over your review comments), but I'm not feeling too good any more
about ephemeral-precious-v1.patch, because my experience with those
facilities has so far proved unsatisfying.  I think I'd like to
withdraw the latter patch pending further study.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Cube extension point support // GSoC'13
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: simple date constructor from numeric values