Re: Commit fest 2017-11 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Commit fest 2017-11
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoahsh4GQPMMRcN6+RcB1v1Pzi0X6WJL0OxnO5swTvriow@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Commit fest 2017-11  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: Commit fest 2017-11
Re: Commit fest 2017-11
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 4:19 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> I wonder if we should consider adding a field to the CF app *specifically*
> to track things like this. What I'm thinking is a field that's set (or at
> least verified) by the person who flags a patch as committed with choices
> like Trivial/Simple/Medium/Complex (trivial being things like typo fixes
> etc, which today can hugely skew the stats).

I think this would be pretty subjective ... and there are also a LOT
of patches that don't go through the CF process.  The ratio of commits
to commitfest entries is at least 5:1.  If we only track what gets
registered in the CF app we're ignoring a huge amount of stuff.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres, fsync, and OSs (specifically linux)
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Commit fest 2017-11