Re: pg_upgrade and toasted pg_largeobject - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: pg_upgrade and toasted pg_largeobject
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoahT=oT7V6ooML+Phs=9ApqiTeoFQ5hPWrDkwNGtErhSQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade and toasted pg_largeobject  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Any thoughts what to do with this?  We could decide that it's a bug fix
> and backpatch, or decide that it's a new feature and delay till 9.7,
> or decide that it's a minor bug fix and add it to 9.6 only.  I kinda lean
> towards the last alternative.

I'm fine with that.

(But I haven't reviewed the code.)

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE lock downgrades have broken pg_upgrade
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Timeline following for logical slots