On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Vik Reykja <vikreykja@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 22:19, Giuseppe Sucameli <brush.tyler@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> thinking you have no skills, I wrote a patch too and posted it to
>> hackers ML about 2 days ago, but I didn't subscribe that list so
>> it is stalled, waiting for someone's approval.
>>
>> For this reason my email is not displayed in the archives.
>> I'm so sorry both have wasted our time in writing 2 patches for
>> the same bug.
>
> I think your patch is more complete than mine so it's definitely not
> wasted.=A0 I spent several hours on mine and now I have a little bit of s=
kills
> :-)
>
> Thank you for your effort; I'm sorry if you feel you have wasted your tim=
e.
I think Vik's patch is better, because it doesn't rely as much on
things that happen to be true today - like which relkinds have system
columns associated with them. But I do agree we ought to handle both
the ADD COLUMN and RENAME COLUMN cases, and as such have posted an
update of Vik's patch on the other thread.
--=20
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Compan
