Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoafwqpO1_iNDLmUdn-j_HeunF_kzWy_1ricW7DoNjEmaA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points  (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Alexander Korotkov
<aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Attached patch fixes GiST behaviour without altering operators behaviour.
>
>
> I think we definitely should apply this patch before 9.2 release, because it
> is a bug fix. Otherwise people will continue produce incorrect GiST indexes
> with in-core geometrical opclasses until 9.3. Patch is very simple and only
> changes few lines of code.
>
> Any thoughts?

Do we need to apply this patch to 9.2?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: TODO list updated for 9.3
Next
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: Re: User-Id Tracking when Portal was started