Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoafhygh1+e3EVmfGRR1SZ8220H4A2Amq4Th=7tJC1HmLg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 12:13 PM Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> My idea about plpgsql PRAGMA is very close to PL/SQL or Ada PRAGMA. This is not runtime statement - the information
fromthis command will be assigned to related object - function, block, command at parser time.
 

That's sensible, but the syntax you were proposing didn't look like it
was related to a specific statement.  I was objecting to the idea that
PRAGMA whatever; should be construed as an annotation of,
specifically, the following statement.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement
Next
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables