Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoadW_JQRSCn4qCQE1FsD+FNwzW+_cLdHDnMf6Qk+S1XiQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> There's still weird behaviour, unfortunately.  If you do an ALTER
> SEQUENCE changing minval/maxval w/ restart in a transaction, and abort,
> you'll a) quite possibly not be able to use the sequence anymore,
> because it may of bounds b) DDL still isn't transactional.

Your emails would be a bit easier to understand if you included a few
more words.

I'm guessing "may of bounds" is supposed to say "may be out of bounds"?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: "Zakharov, Andrey"
Date:
Subject: [BUGS] Update doesnt process the changes
Next
From: asotolongo@gmail.com
Date:
Subject: [BUGS] BUG #14661: authentication behavior(SCRAM-MD5)