Re: Bug in SQL/MED? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Bug in SQL/MED?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoabyGB2Or5ozgBNAvdc+zFE=oibC-ZUPFrCLy+VwnQB3w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug in SQL/MED?  (Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Bug in SQL/MED?
Re: Bug in SQL/MED?
List pgsql-hackers
2011/7/1 Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>:
> 2011/6/30 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>:
>> Excerpts from 花田 茂's message of jue jun 30 06:00:23 -0400 2011:
>>
>>> I attached a patch which fixes file_fdw to check required option
>>> (filename) in its validator function.  I think that such requirement
>>> should be checked again in PlanForeignScan(), as it had been so far.
>>> Note that this patch requires fdw.patch has been applied.
>>
>> I think it'd be good to keep the error check in fileGetOptions() just to
>> ensure that we don't crash in case a catalog is messed up with, though
>> I'd degrade it to elog(ERROR) from ereport.
>
> Thanks for the comments.  Please find attached a patch.  Now file_fdw
> validates filename in:
>
> * file_fdw_validator(), to catch lack of required option at DDL
> * fileGetOptions(), to avoid crash caused by corrupted catalog
>
> I used ereport for the former check, because maybe such error usually
> happens and is visible to users.  This criteria was taken from the
> document "Reporting Errors Within the Server".
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/error-message-reporting.html

Do we want to apply this to 9.1 before beta3?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Small documentation issue
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Range Types, constructors, and the type system