Re: Further simplification of c.h's #include section - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Further simplification of c.h's #include section
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa_y3OWg57WATYevPuQbiUustquVn6Hj08W+KoUShLRkw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Further simplification of c.h's #include section  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Further simplification of c.h's #include section  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Thoughts?

Sure, having a win32_port.h as a sub-include of port.h seems fine.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Assertion failure when the non-exclusive pg_stop_backup aborted.
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] moving some partitioning code to executor