Re: [PATCH] Lazy hashaggregate when no aggregation is needed - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [PATCH] Lazy hashaggregate when no aggregation is needed
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoa_meSYjvMXc_AA7jQz8ftKnoGY4N5EhxHNdycugusvqw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Lazy hashaggregate when no aggregation is needed  ("Etsuro Fujita" <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Lazy hashaggregate when no aggregation is needed  (Ants Aasma <ants@cybertec.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Honestly, I'm not sure that it's worth including this, considering the use
> case...

Since nobody seems crazy about pursuing this, I'm marking this patch Rejected.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Uh, I change my mind about commit_delay + commit_siblings (sort of)
Next
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: User-Id Tracking when Portal was started