On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Peter van Hardenberg <pvh@pvh.ca> writes:
>> Okay - I've narrowed it down to an interaction with schema recreation.
>> Here's a minimal test-case I created by paring back the restore from the
>> pg_restore output until I only had the essence remaining:
>
> Hm ... I'm too tired to trace through the code to prove this theory, but
> I think what's happening is that this bit:
>
>> DROP SCHEMA public;
>> CREATE SCHEMA public;
>
> changes the OID of schema public, whereas the search_path that's cached
> for the cached plan is cached in terms of OIDs. So while there is a
> table named public.z1 at the end of the sequence, it's not in any schema
> found in the cached search path.
>
> We could possibly fix that by making the path be cached as textual names
> not OIDs, but then people would complain (rightly, I think) that
> renaming a schema caused unexpected behavior.
What sort of unexpected behavior?
I mean, search_path in its original form is stored as text, anyway.
So if the unexpected behavior is merely that they're going to be
referencing a different schema, that's going to happen anyway, as soon
as they reconnect. I'm not sure there's any logic in trying to
postpone the inevitable.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
