Re: Inconsistency in reporting checkpointer stats - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Inconsistency in reporting checkpointer stats
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaYRnKGUh7jzVzO2Otukczqjh8=zukjr1wiEhBOEvL5wA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Inconsistency in reporting checkpointer stats  (Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Inconsistency in reporting checkpointer stats
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 8:03 AM Nitin Jadhav
<nitinjadhavpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Robert for sharing your thoughts.
> My first thought was to just remove counting SLRU buffers, then after
> some more analysis, I found that the checkpointer is responsible for
> including both regular data buffers and SLRU buffers.

I know that, but what the checkpointer handles and what ought to be
included in the stats are two separate questions.

I think that the SLRU information is potentially useful, but mixing it
with the information about regular buffers just seems confusing.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nitin Jadhav
Date:
Subject: Re: Inconsistency in reporting checkpointer stats
Next
From: Ranier Vilela
Date:
Subject: Re: code cleanups