Re: StandbyAcquireAccessExclusiveLock doesn't necessarily - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: StandbyAcquireAccessExclusiveLock doesn't necessarily
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaY5KivibJHPWyECMh+4m8Z_1Spj_gqcPVcy4Xz390V0g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: StandbyAcquireAccessExclusiveLock doesn't necessarily  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: StandbyAcquireAccessExclusiveLock doesn't necessarily  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 5:54 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Please explain why you think that would be with no restart.

Because the startup process will die, and if that happens, IIRC,
there's no crash-and-restart loop.  You're just done.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: CREATE ROUTINE MAPPING
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench - add pseudo-random permutation function